
 
        
         
		SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME 
 SESSION I 
 HOW I TREAT  
 SMOLDERING MYELOMA  
 (SMM) 
 SESSION II  
 HOW I TREAT NEWLY  
 DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE  
 MYELOMA 
 SESSION III  
 FROM RISK  
 STRATIFICATION TO   
 RISK-BASED THERAPY? 
 DEBATE 1 
 SHOULD WE USE MRD  
 TESTING TO DETERMINE  
 THERAPY IN MULTIPLE  
 MYELOMA?  
 DEBATE 2 
 IS THERE A FUTURE ROLE  
 OF AUTOLOGOUS STEM  
 CELL TRANSPLANTATION?  
 SESSION IV 
 HOW I TREAT RELAPSED  
 MULTIPLE MYELOMA 
 DEBATE 3 
 SHOULD EVERY PATIENT  
 RECEIVE DARATUMUMAB  
 IN FIRST LINE?  
 ROUNDTABLE 
 MULTIPLE MYELOMA  
 FROM THE PERSPECTIVE  
 OF FDA/EMEA AND  
 FOUNDATIONS  
 SESSION V 
 YOU CAN’T BE IMMUNE  
 FOR IMMUNE THERAPY  
 ANYMORE  
 SESSION VI 
 OTHER PLASMA CELL  
 DYSCRASIAS  
 KEYNOTE LECTURES 
 THE FUTURE OF  
 MULTIPLE MYELOMA  
 SELECTED ABSTRACTS  
 FOR AN ORAL  
 PRESENTATION  
 ABSTRACTS SELECTED   
 AS POSTERS  
 DISCLOSURES 
 ELENA ZAMAGNI (BOLOGNA)  
   
 CASE-BASED LECTURE: HOW I TREAT BONE DISEASE IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA  
    
 IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna  
  Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”   
 Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale    
  Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy   
    
 Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia with a high likelihood of development of bone disease  
 (MBD); as a result, up to 80% of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients present with osteolytic lesions (1).  
 These patients are at high risk for skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathological fractures, spinal cord  
 compression and need for surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention (1). SREs add significantly to the disease  
 burden both in terms of survival and quality of life as well as public health costs (1,2).  
 The pathophysiology of MBD has been well studied and results from MM cell interactions with bone cells  
 including osteocytes, osteoblasts and osteoclasts (3). MM-induced osteocyte apoptosis leads to a favorable  
 niche  for  myeloma  cell  homing,  while  osteocytes  produce  soluble  factors  including  receptor  activator  of  
 nuclear factor (NF)-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL), sclerostin and dickkopf-1, that promote osteoclast activity and  
 impair osteoblast maturation, resulting in bone loss. Suppressed osteoblast activity is mainly mediated by  
 suppression  of  the  Wingless-type  (Wnt)  and  β-catenin  pathway.    MM  cells  and  osteocytes  secrete  Wnt  
 antagonists such as sclerostin and dickkopf-1. Increased osteoclast activity is driven by the activation of the  
 RANK/RANKL signaling system. Additional intracellular and intercellular signaling pathways participate in the  
 complex pathogenesis of MBD, including transforming growth factor-beta signaling; the knowledge of these  
 mechanism have led to the development of novel agents evaluated in clinical trials.   
 Bisphosphonates are pyrophosphate analogues, which bind to exposed areas of hydroxyapatite crystals  
 during  the  bone  remodeling  process  (4).  Osteoclasts  endocytose  bisphosphonates,  which  are  potent  
 inhibitors  of  the  intracellular  farnesyl  pyrophosphate  synthase,  leading  to  osteoclast  apoptosis  and  
 prevention of bone loss. Bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid, ZA or pamidronate) should be administered in all  
 patients with active MM, regardless of the presence or absence of MBD on imaging studies (2). ZA is also  
 indicated for the treatment of MM-related hypercalcemia and it is superior to pamidronate in this setting.  
 Once  patients  achieve  very  good  partial  response  (VGPR)  or  better,  the  treating  physician  may  consider  
 decreasing frequency or discontinuing ZA, if the patient has received one year of monthly ZA. If discontinued,  
 ZA/pamidronate should be reinitiated at the time of biochemical relapse, because this reduces the risk of  
 new bone event at clinical relapse (2).   
 Denosumab is an IgG2 fully human and highly specific monoclonal antibody against RANKL (5). Denosumab  
 imitates the physiological effect of osteoprotegerin, by inhibiting RANKL interaction with RANK, ultimately  
 decreasing bone resorption. Denosumab can be also considered for the treatment of MBD, particularly in  
 patients with renal impairment. Denosumab may prolong progression-free survival among NDMM patients  
 with MBD, who are eligible for autologous transplantation. Denosumab discontinuation is challenging due to  
 rebound  phenomenon.  Ongoing  clinical  trials  are  investigating  the  role  of  denosumab  in  patients  with  
 creatinine clearance <30 ml/min. Other novel bone anabolics are also currently under investigation.  
 Calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be administered to all patients receiving bisphosphonates  
 and/or denosumab, following normalization of serum calcium levels in case of hypercalcemia (2). Creatinine  
 clearance, serum electrolytes and urinary albumin (only for pamidronate) should be monitored monthly and  
 dose  adjustments  should  be  made  accordingly.  A  comprehensive  dental  examination  and  any  necessary  
 invasive  treatment  should  be  performed  before  bisphosphonate/denosumab  initiation.  Bisphosphonates  
 should  be  discontinued  in  cases  of  osteonecrosis  of  the  jaw  (ONJ),  unless  continued  treatment  is  highly  
 needed, e.g. progression of lytic bone disease or recurrent hypercalcemia.   
 Cement  augmentation  is  effective  for  painful  vertebral  compression  fractures.  Radiotherapy  is  
 recommended  for  uncontrolled  pain,  impeding  or  symptomatic  spinal  cord  compression  or  pathological